Reflection on Social Media Case 1: McDStories
Whoever said, “All publicity is good publicity” has never analyzed
the effects of the #McDStories on Twitter. This campaign had good intentions that
happy customers would share their happy stories, and everything would by
sunshine and rainbows but, that just wasn’t the case. This campaign backfired
faster than the vomit and food poisoning that some people on Twitter claimed
that they got from McDonald’s. It’s hard to fully understand exactly what the company
executives were thinking when they launched this campaign, but I think it’s
safe to say that they did not think it through.
One of
the biggest issues that contributed to the backlash of this campaign was that
it was introduced specifically for Twitter. Twitter users are notorious for tearing
issues apart in 140 (or now 280) characters or less. Twitter is a platform that
allows people to be ruthless when sharing their opinion about any hot button
topic. This campaign might have been more successful if they introduced it on a
different platform, such as a TV commercial. The issue with #McDStories is that
it was impossible to control the narrative because obviously, McDonald’s could
not control what was being said on Twitter. If they had issued a commercial
that showed a father and daughter eating chicken nuggets or a Big Mac together
at different times in their lives, which created special memories, then McDonald’s
would be in control of the narrative that they intended. However, even TV commercials
can ignite backlash from not only people on Twitter but all other social media platforms.
In 2017, Pepsi ran a commercial
that featured Kendall Jenner ending a large protest simply by handing a police
officer a can of Pepsi. For maybe the first time ever, the internet was united
in believing that this commercial was garbage. Of course, it was not Pepsi’s
intention to make light of protests that had taken place around the world but
that’s how it came across. It’s apparent that you can never plan on how people
will respond to these ads.
Ron Wion,
McDonald’s USA social media director, made a statement that the
hashtag didn’t go as planned so they shut it down as quickly as they could. I
commend McDonald’s for this. Although they didn’t have control of the situation
at the beginning, they seized control in about 2 hours. I imagine this was a
great learning experience not only for McDonald’s but for companies everywhere.
That goes to say that no matter how successful a company may be, pleasing
everyone is just simply, not on the menu.
https://www.wired.com/2017/04/pepsi-ad-internet-response/
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/222691
https://www.wired.com/2017/04/pepsi-ad-internet-response/
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/222691
I agree that control was the important factor that McDonalds lost with the hashtag. They had no idea what was coming!
ReplyDeleteI really like that you brought up another advertisement that had a negative effect on the company's image! When creating an advertisement campaign of any kind, it is vital that the campaign comes across as both positive and ethical. Both situations you mentioned failed because they left room for a lot of interpretation. This leads to irony, assumption making, and potentially dangerous and harmful imagery of the company in question.
ReplyDeleteNot sure why my name didn't show on my comment! I wrote this comment I'm replying to.
Delete-Madison Memmott
Thank you for noticing that! I think you have to choose who you are replying as... If that makes sense? As in, what profile you will use to reply. -Jaycie Martini
Delete